Melancon Castigates Vitter Over Landrieu Ammendment Sunday, Jan 3 2010 

Unsurprisingly, Rep. Charlie Melancon is castigating Senator David Vitter for not supporting an amendment in the Senate Health Care Bill that Senator Mary Landrieu prostituted herself to have put into it. Go figure! Landrieu proudly brags of her $300 Million pay-off — in the name of Louisiana — for her vote of a bill that will fundamentally transform our nation.

Melancon and Landrieu think like piranha. They see people held captive in poverty by the chains of welfare, and they do their best to see their victims stay there. If America’s poor were to wake up from the stupor that befuddles them, they would see that the very programs and promises made by the government will never satisfy.

The concept of private property, and individuals reaping the fruit of their labor, is fundamental to any free society. In fact, the eighth commandment clearly states, “Do not steal”. There is no qualification or exception to it — not even vote by majority. Theft by any other name is still theft, and that is what Vitter opposes.

Landrieu and Melancon do not understand that government’s job is not to provide equal things, but equal opportunity. Legalized theft, i.e. taxes, is Karl Marx’s central method of leveling the masses. In the name of “caring for the hurting”, the Statist takes from the producers, and gives to the moochers.

People who produce will stop producing if they are not able to keep the money they earned. Look at the late USSR. In 1917, the Communists made promises of bread, land, and peace — a utopia that only government could provide! However, in a few short years, after the “cleansing” of the country, massive famine consumed the nation. Hardship and shortages were the trademark of the implementation of Marxism on the unfortunate Russian populace.

Vitter is standing up for Louisianans, and, in so doing, for the nation. We do not need more back-room deals in Washington. We need statesmen who uphold the constitution. Melancon’s words reveal his bribability, whereas Vitter’s actions, thus far, show he puts principle before personal profit.

Melancom, Vitter clash over fed’s Medicaid fix

A Chance Meeting Friday, Nov 20 2009 

Last night I attended a function where several young aids representing their bosses, Charlie Melancon and Mary Landrieu, were present. It was a social occasion; one meant to wine (although there was none), and dine them (many Cajun delicacies such as fried alligator and boiled shrimp were available).

Through the course of events, I began conversing with Charlie Melancon’s aide, Carl. He is a tall, good looking, young, fit, hip, black man, who is intelligent and well spoken. Overall, it was a pleasure to speak with him. Although not the gathering’s purpose, I brought up the subject of the current Health Care reform Washington is trying to jam down the throat of an unwilling American citizenry. He remained calm, and stayed on the same liberal talking points of how some people just can’t afford health care and need help to do so, and how people who earn more than their basic needs demand must give some of their surplus to those who, for whatever reason, can’t provide such for themselves.

I listened (and sometimes interrupted) to his comments, and tried to reason with him. I enacted an object lesson of how the government must steal money from a producer to give it to a moocher. When I asked him if he has ever read anything by or about Karl Marx, he replied that he had for several years. (I assumed in college; not as a personal interest.) Therefore, I challenged him to stop, think and consider how the actions he was promoting in government came directly from Karl Marx. I urged him too observe that Marx’s philosophy, implemented on any level, has never worked, does not work, and never will work. With that, our conversation ended.

To read a wonderful article about the Bible’s stance on Socialism, click on the link below.


Is Socialism Biblical? by Joel McDermott

Where In The World is Charlie Melancon? Sunday, Feb 22 2009 

Immediately after voting FOR the enslavement of multi-generations of Americans to the government, 3rd District Congressman Charlie Melancon and his wife, Peachy, rushed to the airport with six other congressional couples and Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, for an eight day all expense tax-payer paid trip to Europe. Hey, why not? They’re slaves over there, I guess the party needed to see how socialism works and what ‘perks’ they can glean from it.
His actions have been defended by his supporters that Charlie had to go because he is so important, and was going to NATO. Sure, he may have gone to NATO, because NANCY PELOSI made a stop there so the “Valentine’s Day” trip to Paris, Brussels, and other romantic cities would be paid for by those of us who pay taxes. (We’ve learned from Obama’s appointments, and the uncovering of some elected officials, that they don’t have to pay taxes . . . as long as they don’t get caught. But, if by some unfortunate event their tax evasion is exposed, they don’t have to pay penalties or go to jail.)

If you disagree with Melancon’s vote for the so called Recovery Package (which, by the way, VP Joe Biden said has a 33% chance of failure, and talk of a second package is in the pipes), e-mail him and let him know your thoughts.

Pork-out Package Vote Sunday, Feb 1 2009 

As has been reported, 188 members of the House of Representatives voted against the Pork/Payoff package that the Speaker and the President ardently want passed. The 188 members consisted of all House Republicans, and 11 Democrats. Louisiana Congressional District 3′s representative, Congressman Charlie Melancon was not among them. He supported this massive leftist legislation that will put us and future generations in enormous debt.
Below is a link to contact information to Charlie Melancon’s offices in Washington and Louisiana. Please contact him and let him know of your displeasure in his vote for the legislation.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.