Success and Material Possessions Correlate Wednesday, May 19 2010 

Until recently, people equated success by the quality and amount of material possessions they obtained. Now, under the guise of simplifying one’s life, pressure is mounting to discard one’s things, and cast off many modern comforts.

I know a family who succumbed to the lie that greed was the root of their material wealth, and believed they had too much because they were hoarding. Therefore, they sold their beautiful home and many of their lovely possessions in an effort to ‘simplify’. They felt guilty for their prosperity.

Guilt manipulators condemn success, and assault prosperity in a concerted effort to coerce their victims into thinking: less is more — attempting to make everyone equal. If one realizes any level of affluence, and acquires abundant possessions, they make him feel criminal because he has more than others.

Keynesian social engineers tout the innocent unproductive populace as the backbone of society — although they are never satisfied with what they have, and continually crave for more. Furthermore, they feel entitled to a share of the producer’s income, and the government provides it for them in housing, food, healthcare, and schools. Vilified as insatiably greedy is he who buys his own home, eats his own food, gets his own healthcare, and chooses which schools he attends. The wealthy are repeatedly accused of achieving success illegitimately — they obviously cheat the system to make their money — a la Gordon Gekko in the original movie: Wall Street. (Not to be confused with the gecko that rakes in millions of dollars for an American insurance company, and makes it look so easy even a caveman can do it.)

Successful people work hard, have expertise in their respective fields, provide excellent service, and risk failure. There rests the beauty of a free capitalistic society — effort, skill, good service, and fearlessness result in financial reward proportionately.

People strive for a better lifestyle for themselves and their family. Remove that incentive, and those who produce will stop producing and all of society will suffer for it. It is the pursuit of private property which propels mankind forward — even for the French. Many people living in centrally planned societies look at the affluence we enjoy, and yearn to have the same opportunities available to them in their own countries. But alas, many suffer under despot leaders — who, of course, deny themselves no luxury — yet oppress their subjects through so-called ‘social justice’.

Liberty is good, and prosperity is the natural by-product of a free society. Edmond Burke, the great English statesman of the 18th century, correctly observed: free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Let us not become fatalities of those who want to strip us of our liberty and thereby impoverish us as a nation. Birthed as the beacon of freedom, America must stand firm in her heritage, and resist the guilt manipulators who condemn her, and want to control her citizens by ‘simplifying’ their lives.

A Republic, Not A Democracy Friday, Mar 5 2010 

Since the people of these United States have become engaged in the opposition of the blatant attempted takeover by the federal government, I have heard many declare “we are a Democracy!“ This could not be farther from the truth. We are a Republic; always have been, and I pray always will be.

In my reading, I have come across a statement made by the US War Department, which I believe every American citizen should read and understand. It is as follows:

“Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of ‘direct’ expression. Results in mobocracy [mob rule]. Attitude toward property is communistic — negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism [trying to stir up the people by appeals to emotion, prejudice, etc., in order to establish a new leader], license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.”

“Republic: Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidences, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress . . . . Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They ‘made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic’ ” (U.S. War Department, Training Manual No. 2000-25, November 30, 1928).

Obama Immasculating the Military Wednesday, Dec 2 2009 

Last night, our haggard looking President (lavish late night parties?) stood before the photo-optable West Point Cadets, to announce his plan to send 30,000 troops, 10,000 less than requested, to Afghanistan for a mere 18 months. This man continues to prove he is an immature, inexperienced, wanna-be man. It is incomprehensible to me that thinking people actually voted for this embarrassment to lead our nation and armed forces.

This man doesn’t know how to fight a strategic military battle (although he is quite adept at playing covertly coercive thug politics). His announcement last night was comparable to Mike Tyson telling Hollifield he was going to bite his ear off at the end of the fight if Mike was losing. Yeah, I can just see Hollifield never putting his guard up for that one! “Sure Mike, whatever you say!”, is how he would respond. And when the moment came, Hollifield would be completely taken off guard. Right?

Isn’t that what Obama is doing with the Taliban? The next thing we can expect is the disclosure of where the troops are going to be stationed, and how many will be at each point. Oh that Commander In Chief . . . he’s a crafty one! You know the enemy doesn’t watch any of the press coming out of Washington, or any speeches Obama makes (certainly wish we didn‘t have to). Why, no! They are totally oblivious morons out in the desert playing with a stray iguana whenever they find one. They’re not trying to destroy The Great Satan. No, they aren’t killing our troops, burning their bodies, and hanging their corpses from a bridge for all to see. No, not the Taliban. Not Obama’s good buddies.

I pray our nation will be able to endure the destructive dismantling Obama is doing to this country’s ability to defend herself. May God judge him for his treasonous deeds and display of unabashed hubris.

Where In The World Is Barack Hussein Obama? Tuesday, Nov 10 2009 

Once again President Obama has displayed his disdain for the country he leads.
Obama's Berlin Wall Blunder

Pelosi – 1; Freedom of Choice – 0 Sunday, Nov 1 2009 

Yesterday, Louisiana Senator David Vitter came to Houma, Louisiana, and held yet another town hall meeting. Scheduled only two days after the nefarious Nancy Pelosi health care bill exploded on an unwilling American citizenry, Vitter addressed the crowd. Having with him the 2,000 page, 20-pound bill, and a panel of 1 doctor and 1 small business owner from the area, the audience of over 200 people listened with anticipation for words that would quell their fears. At least ten percent had the opportunity to speak directly to the Senator asking questions or making comments. The audience was calm, but with the specter of that albatross of a bill looming on the table in front of them, everyone paid close attention.

People are concerned that this bill transforms American healthcare into an American nightmare, and rightfully so. Its real purpose is about power, not healthcare. Who has the right to make choices for the individual — the individual, or the government? When does one go to sleep? What does one eat? Does one smoke? May one be over weight, or under weight? According to Nancy Pelosi and her ‘historic’ bill, a bureaucrat will decide all, because the government knows best. We are now a collective.

A Call to D.C. — November 5, 2009 Saturday, Oct 31 2009 

As Washington secures the shackles of slavery around the nation’s feet, tyranny looms in darkness waiting to turn the key. We must fight harder than ever before. Radical Marxists have infiltrated our government, and are destroying our country. What heritage shall we leave our children? Freedom or bondage?

Much Ado About Castro Saturday, Sep 5 2009 

Rep. Diane Watson’s (D-CA) unabashed praises of an oppressive tyrant are reprehensible. Her revealing comments venerate Marxist theory, and smack of racial preference toward blacks. She praises the overthrow of Cuban Prime Minister Fulgencio Batista by Che Guarva, and raves about the fabulous health care Fidel Castro provides for his subjects. (She needs, however, to make a quick review of history to get her facts straight. Castro was no innocent bystander, as she alludes in her adulation of him, who Guarva found to replace Batista as Cuba’s Prime Minister. No, it was actually the exiled Castro who found Guarva in Mexico, and returned with 1,400 revolutionaries to overthrow Batista. It took time, but eventually Batista’s regime fell, and Jose Miro Cardona was installed as Prime Minister. Not surprisingly, though, after a mere six weeks in office he “mysteriously” resigned, and Castro was sworn in to replace him.)
Sure, tyranny is great . . . as long as you’re the tyrant. Do our politicians honestly believe they will prosper as they do now if they impose on the American people the oppression with which they are so enamored? Are they such fools? Do they think the American people are witless mice that will allow their lives, liberty, and property to be taken from them without a fight?
Rise up America before blood is spilled on our soil once again! Politicians who extol political thought such as Socialism, Marxism, or Communism, which are the enemies of Capitalism, must be voted out of office! If we want to retain and pass on Liberty with all the prosperity it provides, we must not grow weary in battle. We must fight the good fight! We must never, never, never give up.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.