Success and Material Possessions Correlate Wednesday, May 19 2010 

Until recently, people equated success by the quality and amount of material possessions they obtained. Now, under the guise of simplifying one’s life, pressure is mounting to discard one’s things, and cast off many modern comforts.

I know a family who succumbed to the lie that greed was the root of their material wealth, and believed they had too much because they were hoarding. Therefore, they sold their beautiful home and many of their lovely possessions in an effort to ‘simplify’. They felt guilty for their prosperity.

Guilt manipulators condemn success, and assault prosperity in a concerted effort to coerce their victims into thinking: less is more — attempting to make everyone equal. If one realizes any level of affluence, and acquires abundant possessions, they make him feel criminal because he has more than others.

Keynesian social engineers tout the innocent unproductive populace as the backbone of society — although they are never satisfied with what they have, and continually crave for more. Furthermore, they feel entitled to a share of the producer’s income, and the government provides it for them in housing, food, healthcare, and schools. Vilified as insatiably greedy is he who buys his own home, eats his own food, gets his own healthcare, and chooses which schools he attends. The wealthy are repeatedly accused of achieving success illegitimately — they obviously cheat the system to make their money — a la Gordon Gekko in the original movie: Wall Street. (Not to be confused with the gecko that rakes in millions of dollars for an American insurance company, and makes it look so easy even a caveman can do it.)

Successful people work hard, have expertise in their respective fields, provide excellent service, and risk failure. There rests the beauty of a free capitalistic society — effort, skill, good service, and fearlessness result in financial reward proportionately.

People strive for a better lifestyle for themselves and their family. Remove that incentive, and those who produce will stop producing and all of society will suffer for it. It is the pursuit of private property which propels mankind forward — even for the French. Many people living in centrally planned societies look at the affluence we enjoy, and yearn to have the same opportunities available to them in their own countries. But alas, many suffer under despot leaders — who, of course, deny themselves no luxury — yet oppress their subjects through so-called ‘social justice’.

Liberty is good, and prosperity is the natural by-product of a free society. Edmond Burke, the great English statesman of the 18th century, correctly observed: free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Let us not become fatalities of those who want to strip us of our liberty and thereby impoverish us as a nation. Birthed as the beacon of freedom, America must stand firm in her heritage, and resist the guilt manipulators who condemn her, and want to control her citizens by ‘simplifying’ their lives.

A Republic, Not A Democracy Friday, Mar 5 2010 

Since the people of these United States have become engaged in the opposition of the blatant attempted takeover by the federal government, I have heard many declare “we are a Democracy!“ This could not be farther from the truth. We are a Republic; always have been, and I pray always will be.

In my reading, I have come across a statement made by the US War Department, which I believe every American citizen should read and understand. It is as follows:

“Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of ‘direct’ expression. Results in mobocracy [mob rule]. Attitude toward property is communistic — negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism [trying to stir up the people by appeals to emotion, prejudice, etc., in order to establish a new leader], license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.”

“Republic: Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidences, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress . . . . Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They ‘made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic’ ” (U.S. War Department, Training Manual No. 2000-25, November 30, 1928).

Three Worldviews Clamor for Dominance Wednesday, Dec 30 2009 

The three competing political/economic philosophies in the world today are Humanism, Islam, and Christianity. These opposing philosophies result in three very different outcomes, yet each has the goal of complete world domination.

Humanism exalts man as its ultimate authority, uses man’s words to direct it, and implements violent revolution to further it. Mao’s axiom “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun” summarizes how the Marxist-Leninist worldview overcomes all opposition. Revolutionaries view themselves as saviors of the world who must control every thought and action in order to achieve the promised utopia — meanwhile imprisoning, torturing, and killing anyone who resists. Accordingly, creativity is stifled, productivity stops, and prosperity is impossible.

Islam, with Allah as its god, establishes a militaristic theocracy that is brutal to its members through oppressive sharia law set forth in the Koran. War, or jihad, is at its very heart, and the oft-suicidal efforts of Islam’s members to kill their enemies are highly esteemed. Islam squelches the advancement of technology, industry, and invention wherever it prevails. Like Humanism, the consolidation of prosperity to the ruling class, forces the masses to suffer in abject poverty with no hope of improvement.

Finally, the Christian philosophy, using the Judeo-Christian Bible as its code of ethics, liberates societies to be free, productive, and unique. Biblical law protects private property, thus allowing people to enjoy the fruit of their labor. Members within a Christian society are able to choose in what manner and to what degree they want to prosper, and are given the liberty to succeed or fail.

The United States of America, founded on the Christian philosophy of politics and economics a mere 200 years ago, has advanced civilization throughout the earth farther and faster than ever before experienced by man. Unfortunately, our nation is drifting more and more away from the prosperity inducing Christian principles into the murky waters of Humanism, while cowering to the demands of Islam. Consequently, the so-called elites in government strip us of our freedom, while exempting themselves from their own tyranny. Thus, prosperity wanes.

It is the Christian political and economic philosophy of liberty for all, not just a few, which has made our country prosperous. We must refuse Humanism and Islam. We must uphold our constitution. We must return to our God — or we will perish like Rome before us.

Caution! Parasite Sightings Wednesday, Oct 7 2009 

The parasites on top are as bad as the parasites on the bottom — maybe worse. It amazes me how people like Nancy Pelosi and others in government are completely oblivious to the effort it takes for individuals to generate income. I called my representative’s office in Washington awhile back about HB3200, and the young aide who answered the phone was a bit impertinent (I’m certain he had been beat-up verbally for several days or weeks already from an outraged constituency). During our conversation I mentioned how they, including him, were parasites on working Americans, and he became indignant. He proclaimed, “I work!” to which I replied, “But I’m the one who supplies the money for your check!” He got real calm after that.

Nancy Pelosi needs to get a revelation. Perhaps if she worked in corporate America and was forced to live on her income alone, without her husband’s or government support, she would not continue forward with the audacious idea of a VAT (Value Added Tax). Once again, Americans who enjoy liberty and the prosperity it provides must rise up and fight this incredulous constraint on capitalism.

He’s Paid WHAT? Monday, Jan 19 2009 

To attract good people to work for you, you must pay well for their services, that’s a given. The question is, “How many unelected support staff does a government need”? The following link lists educators and coaches at LSU, physicians at LSU’s public hospitals, and some researchers at Pennington Biomedical Research Center — employees who, I believe, deserve the money they make. However, I’m certain there are others who don’t deserve theirs, and they’re not listed.

We must guard ourselves not to get caught up in the growing “income-envy” frenzy our nation is currently experiencing, and that is what I believe this article attempts to stir up. There are reasons people in leadership get paid more than those who are “rank-and-file”. Although some in state appointed positions may be paid more than what the average Louisianan makes, they also may be making far less than what a person in the private sector makes in an equivalent position. Therefore, the governor must vet his appointees carefully in order to prevent appointing, or the state hiring, some low-life, corrupt, parasite to a position of influence.

It is interesting, though, that State Sen. Sharon Broome, D-Baton Rouge, raised the issue of state employees earning too much at a recent legislative committee meeting, saying her constituents want to see a cut in salaries, but, according to the article, only mentioned it in order to say she did so. Her intention, the article continued to say, is not to vote for any salary decreases — even though her constituents are clamoring for it.

Sunday, January 18th, 2009
11,839 State Paychecks Top $70,000 (103,000 On State Taxpayer Payroll!!!)by MICHELLE MILLHOLLON – Advocate (excerpt)Sunday, January 18th, 2009

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.