Obama like Jesus? Monday, Apr 12 2010 

Some people confuse racism — preference given or denied due to one’s race, with Socialism — the political ideology of: “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need“. Therefore, they believe when someone says the agenda and actions of President Obama are socialistic, that the person who opposes him does so only because Obama is partly black. They will not deny he is a socialist, but will deflect the accusation with cries of racism, and justify his actions by comparing him to Jesus, who, in their minds, was a Socialist in His own right. Both positions, however, are incorrect.

I recommend David Chilton’s book, “Productive Christians in the Age of Guilt Manipulators” for deeper study, but will briefly address these two gross misnomers.

Jesus’ life and teachings promote truth, private property, and individual liberty with responsibility, which are foundational to the proper working of the free market. Regarding healthcare, Jesus never demanded His followers who were doctors (Luke, for example) to practice medicine at their own financial demise. He took nothing from anyone else to give sight, hearing, restored limbs, or the breath of life to those He touched. People received from Him freely, and He gave from His own resources — no one else’s.

Jesus did not continuously feed the poor, either. He never gave preference to someone because he was rich or poor — he treated all equally. On the three occasions when He fed the multitudes, they first listened to Him speak before receiving anything, and when He fed them (out of concern for their strength to travel home), He did so without collecting everyone’s food and redistributing it for all to share equally.

We must remember, too, that Jesus in no way worked for or represented the government. He did not command the government to go and do His work — He commanded His disciples. It is the job of the government to guarantee equal opportunity, not equal property. It is the responsibility of the church to help the poor — but he who refuses to work, shall not eat.

A worker is worth his wages, but not all work is equal, therefore, neither are wages.

Jesus lived a perfect life which included obeying the eighth commandment, “Do not steal”. If Obama wants to imitate Him, he can begin by keeping his hands out of the people’s pockets.

Obama Aids the Enemy He Will Not Name Monday, Jan 11 2010 

Pamela Geller is a terrific writer with a clarity most anyone will appreciate. In the link below, Geller brings to our attention an executive order signed by Obama at year’s end, 2009, that will detrimentally declassify records sealed as recently as 25 years ago.

Obama’s audacity is not hope — it is the pure unadulterated destruction of the greatest nation in the history of man.

Obama Aids the Enemy He Will Not Name.

Obama Immasculating the Military Wednesday, Dec 2 2009 

Last night, our haggard looking President (lavish late night parties?) stood before the photo-optable West Point Cadets, to announce his plan to send 30,000 troops, 10,000 less than requested, to Afghanistan for a mere 18 months. This man continues to prove he is an immature, inexperienced, wanna-be man. It is incomprehensible to me that thinking people actually voted for this embarrassment to lead our nation and armed forces.

This man doesn’t know how to fight a strategic military battle (although he is quite adept at playing covertly coercive thug politics). His announcement last night was comparable to Mike Tyson telling Hollifield he was going to bite his ear off at the end of the fight if Mike was losing. Yeah, I can just see Hollifield never putting his guard up for that one! “Sure Mike, whatever you say!”, is how he would respond. And when the moment came, Hollifield would be completely taken off guard. Right?

Isn’t that what Obama is doing with the Taliban? The next thing we can expect is the disclosure of where the troops are going to be stationed, and how many will be at each point. Oh that Commander In Chief . . . he’s a crafty one! You know the enemy doesn’t watch any of the press coming out of Washington, or any speeches Obama makes (certainly wish we didn‘t have to). Why, no! They are totally oblivious morons out in the desert playing with a stray iguana whenever they find one. They’re not trying to destroy The Great Satan. No, they aren’t killing our troops, burning their bodies, and hanging their corpses from a bridge for all to see. No, not the Taliban. Not Obama’s good buddies.

I pray our nation will be able to endure the destructive dismantling Obama is doing to this country’s ability to defend herself. May God judge him for his treasonous deeds and display of unabashed hubris.

Where In The World Is Barack Hussein Obama? Tuesday, Nov 10 2009 

Once again President Obama has displayed his disdain for the country he leads.
Obama's Berlin Wall Blunder

Who’s Side Is Obama On? Saturday, Nov 7 2009 

On Thursday, November 5, a Muslim U.S. Army Major scheduled for deployment to Iraq killed 13 and wounded 38 on US Army base Fort Hood, near Killeen, Texas. Fox News’ coverage of the massacre gave frequent moment-by-moment updates keeping everyone abreast of breaking news. President Obama announced he would address the nation about the tragedy that afternoon, and I waited eagerly to hear what he had to say. The news anchor seemed perplexed that Obama would be addressing the country at such an early stage, and made a couple of suggestions as to why he was doing it. He was positive and supportive of the President’s decision, and proposed his motivation was possibly because he wanted to quell any fears or concerns in the hearts of the American people due to the incomprehensibleness of the attack.

Then Obama hit the airwaves. The man’s opening remarks were to some American Indian / Internal Affairs convention he was attending. He commended people, gave a “shout out”, and promised not to forget our “Native Americans”. Finally, he got around to the attack. He sounded cold, unmoved, and uninformed. While the rest of the country knew the number dead and wounded, he didn‘t, and tried to pretend he was up to snuff on the facts by saying, “we will keep you informed “, but even the blind could see through that thin veneer. His ignorance and apathy were evident for all to behold. This man is a disgrace to our country, and an insult to our men in uniform. It’s like the Clinton administration on steroids.

A Call to D.C. — November 5, 2009 Saturday, Oct 31 2009 

As Washington secures the shackles of slavery around the nation’s feet, tyranny looms in darkness waiting to turn the key. We must fight harder than ever before. Radical Marxists have infiltrated our government, and are destroying our country. What heritage shall we leave our children? Freedom or bondage?

An Article from RealClearPolitics.com Friday, Oct 30 2009 

Why Democrats Should Start to Sweat.

The Dangerous Climate Change Deception Friday, Oct 23 2009 

In early December, our Pulitzer Peace Prize winning President Barack Hussein Obama (mmm – mmm – mmm) will be attending the Conference of the States’ Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen. There he is expected to sign an international climate change treaty which will completely undermine our national sovereignty. This 200 page document has three very disconcerting foundational parts. First, it establishes a government of unelected officials appointed by the UN who will govern the member States. Second, it establishes “climate debt” which demands that wealthier industrialized member states must annually pay poorer less developed member states up to 2% of their national GDP because of their culpability in altering the climate. Third, the right to enforce all economic and environmental policies this new government would impose on member states.

However, the President’s signature alone won’t bind the United States to this unwanted unnecessary treaty — our Constitution requires a 2/3 vote in the Senate to ratify it before becoming law. So what’s so horrible if the Senate succeeds in ratifying a climate change treaty? The Constitution mandates that all international treaties shall take precedence over it. In other words, our liberty and prosperity are looking down the barrel of a cannon poised to utterly destroy them. We must remain vigilant and let our Senators know that we do not want this country altering treaty ratified when it comes before them.

I’ll keep you updated as events unfold.

Obama gets the NPP Award! Friday, Oct 9 2009 

I am in shock! Early this morning President Obama was awarded the coveted Nobel Peace Prize — and the $1 million that accompanies it. Apparently, the committee perceives Obama as a politician they can buy off, and is attempting to do so.

According to AP writers Karl Ritter and Matt Moore, committee chairman Thorbjoern Jagland said, “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future,” They have hope? Hope?! HOPE?!! Great Scott! Obama has done nothing but cause disharmony, infighting, fear, and insecurity in the nation he leads. What gives them hope? If the United States’ economy collapses, from where are the rest of the world leaders going to get their international aide checks? Is England going to pay them? No, they’re broke. France? Yeah, right. Spain? I wouldn’t count on it. Cuba? Not in your wildest dreams! Russia? Keep guessing. China? Not on your life. America is the most generous nation in the history of man as well as the most prosperous. Prosperity derived from hard work within a capitalistic economic system incubated in liberty. We are a sovereign nation which does what is best for us; not follow the demands of rogue dictators, socialist leaders, or the Marxist pandering UN. Of course, the globalist ideologues on the committee, who gave Al Gore the same prize in 2004, have their own agenda, and Obama is the American leader they believe who has embraced it.

Let Obama bask in his undeserved momentary recognition. His pride, arrogance, and lack of experience will reveal the depths of his treacherous heart, the unworthiness of his deeds, and the motive of the committee’s decision.

Guilt Manipulators Thursday, May 28 2009 

I read an editorial in this week’s Tri-Parish Times, and it is a perfect example of the attitude that has gotten us into the financial mess our nation is currently suffering. The article, by Rev. Wilmer L. Todd, told the story of a young woman using a government issued, malfunctioning, food stamp card at a local grocery store. She was holding up the line in her attempts to get the card to “take”, and in the process, a man made a comment that people on welfare need to get a job like everyone else. The young woman then ran out of the store in embarrassment leaving all her groceries. Awe, but the story continued as we learned the woman was only 20 years old, single, and taking care of her deceased brother’s three children. (He died in Afghanistan). Personally, I do not care what her situation was or is. Situations can be changed, at least for now, in this country. I also have a few questions. For example, why did she have the children and not the mother? How old were the kids? Young children love macaroni and cheese — Kraft Macaroni and Cheese to be specific, and that is cheap. It would be nice if we all could eat Kobe beef as President Obama and his family, but few of us live in such opulence, and have to cut corners.

Upon hearing of the woman’s pitiful situation (which she brought upon herself), the man making the comment felt guilty, and all the people in line began to pile up groceries to give to this 20 year old single surrogate of three, while he paid the $1,646.57 bill, not to mention write out a check for a freezer and other incidentals. Great, I am glad he was willing to help on a personal level (although motivated by guilt for making a politically incorrect true statement). No one confiscated the money he spent on this young woman — he gave it willingly. However, welfare is legalized theft, and that is what this woman and anyone else on food stamps is practicing. Food stamps do not help anyone. Quite the antithesis, they encourage people not to excel and earn more, because they get “stamps” for free, and if they make more money than is allowed, they will stop getting their free stamps and have to pay taxes like everyone else. Nevertheless, we hear the big sob story of the hardships people are experiencing, thus manipulating us to feel guilty if we do not let government take from us to “help” them. Life is hard — especially in one’s 20s. Moreover, if one messes up the 20s too badly, one can expect even greater hardships in one’s 30s and beyond.

Unfortunately, we are encouraging single motherhood which is detrimental to our society! I was single until almost 45, was never pregnant, never entertained the idea of adopting children, and never had foster kids. Children need a sound, stable, two parent (one male to one female) home to be emotionally healthy. Single parenthood happens, but it should be the exception, not the rule. If this young woman voluntarily took her brother’s three children, than she should an a good example, and not live off the government. She can do it if she tries! However, if she needs temporary assistance, there are private charities that would love to help, would hold her accountable, and motivate her toward self-sufficiency. Private charities are not designed for generational rolls like government welfare.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.